Current:Home > ContactCan my employer use my photos to promote its website without my permission? Ask HR -AssetBase
Can my employer use my photos to promote its website without my permission? Ask HR
View
Date:2025-04-14 20:00:50
Johnny C. Taylor Jr. tackles your human resources questions as part of a series for USA TODAY. Taylor is president and CEO of the Society for Human Resource Management, the world's largest HR professional society and author of "Reset: A Leader’s Guide to Work in an Age of Upheaval.”
Have a question? Submit it here.
Question: My employer has utilized some of my photos on their social media and website to promote their business. I was never notified or asked for permission. Should they be allowed to use my images without my permission and compensation? – Marvin
Answer: Your employer may be able to use the images found on your social media platforms. In the age of Facebook, Instagram and X, formerly Twitter, it’s a common practice for individuals and organizations to repost others’ photographs and images. Unfortunately, laws have not kept up with our social media era and the ability to share, remix, or modify online content.
No federal law prohibits an employer from using an employee’s photo for business purposes. However, many states have statutes commonly known as “right-of-publicity” or “right-of-privacy” laws. In some states, they may be addressed as “unfair competition” or “personality rights.” These state laws prevent using an individual’s name, image, voice, photo, or “likeness” for commercial purposes without prior consent from the individual. I recommend you review your state laws to see if the use of your social media photos falls under its statutes.
Social media platforms are not considered public domain, and the use of your photos could also be limited by copyright laws or the platform’s terms and conditions. Even under a platform’s terms and conditions, it likely cannot stop your employer from using or reposting your photos. Copyright laws protect the photographer and will likely not apply to photos you appear in unless they are selfies.
Legal remedies aren’t always the most prudent or practical solution to disputes between two parties – in this case, you and your employer. Indeed, if you have a problem with your employer using your photos, you can always let them know. They should be willing to respond to a respectful and reasonable request. If you are concerned that it may be a thorny or contentious issue, you should probably start by speaking with your HR team. I hope you find an amicable agreement with your employer to protect your privacy.
Performance reviewIs there any recourse for a poor job review with no prior feedback? Ask HR
I was let go from my last job because I could not see well enough at night to drive safely. My job was from 8 a.m. to 4:40 p.m. most days. Everyone in my department was expected to be available to work at night if called upon. I informed the company during my interview that I could not see to drive at night. They could not find any fault with my work, so they used my inability to drive at night as cause for my termination. Is this a case of discrimination? – Powell”
Answer: Losing a job is never easy, and it can be incredibly disheartening when you feel as though you were performing well and the termination was unjustified. To answer your question, it could be a case of discrimination, but it will depend on the facts and circumstances.
Under The Americans with Disabilities Act, employers with 15 or more employees must engage candidates and employees in an interactive process to determine if they are “qualified individuals,” meaning “an individual who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires.” This means that if driving at night was an essential function of your job, you may not be eligible for an accommodation, and they could terminate you.
Suppose your former employer is subject to ADA regulations. In this case, they should have used the information you provided about driving at night as a catalyst for going through the interactive process to identify if you were eligible for a reasonable accommodation. For example, if night driving occurs just three or four times per year, maybe a reasonable accommodation would be for your company to provide you with an Uber or Lyft on those rare occasions when they need you to work until dark.
Determining whether a reasonable accommodation exists would likely include obtaining medical documentation from you or your physician. There are some cases when a specific accommodation may not be suitable due to cost or the impact on the workforce, but your company (not you) bears the burden of proving an accommodation is a burden.
You may want to contact your Human Resources department for additional information and to see if the ADA applies to your previous employer. If you feel your employer missed steps, consider speaking to legal counsel or your local Department of Labor for additional insight.
Drug testingShould I get paid for time spend getting a test? Ask HR
veryGood! (6)
Related
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Detroit Lions’ defensive back Cameron Sutton sought in Florida domestic violence warrant
- Shop Like a Frugal Billionaire in Amazon Outlet's Big Spring Sale Section, With Savings Up to 68% Off
- Woman’s body found in rubble of Utah house explosion
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Reddit poised to make its stock market debut after IPO prices at $34 per share amid strong demand
- Chase Stokes Pushes Back on People Who Think He’s “Oversharing” His Relationship With Kelsea Ballerini
- 2024 NFL free agency grades: Which teams aced their moves, and which ones bombed?
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Teacher fatally shot, 14-year-old daughter arrested after fleeing Mississippi home
Ranking
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Fate of Texas immigration law SB4 allowing for deportation now in 5th Circuit court's hands
- Georgia carries out first execution in more than 4 years
- Brother of airport director shot by ATF agents speaks out about shooting
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Gene Kelly's widow says their nearly 50-year age gap was 'not an issue'
- USWNT get Germany, Australia in group stage at Paris Olympics; US men get host France
- Kentucky couple tried to sell their newborn twins for $5,000, reports say
Recommendation
Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
'Real Housewives of Potomac' star Karen Huger involved in car crash after allegedly speeding
Missouri Supreme Court declines to halt execution of a man who killed 2 in 2006
Suspect charged in Indianapolis bar shooting that killed 1 person and injured 5
2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
It's Showtime: See Michael Keaton's Haunting Transformation for Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Role
Courtney B. Vance Sums Up Secret to Angela Bassett Marriage in 2 Words
Execution in Georgia: Man to be put to death for 1993 murder of former girlfriend