Current:Home > reviewsArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -AssetBase
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-13 17:32:09
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- King Charles III Shares His Great Sadness After Missing Royal Event
- Under threat of a splintering base, Obama and Clinton bring star power to rally Dems for Biden
- Potential Changes to Alternate-Fuel Standards Could Hike Gas Prices in California. Critics See a ‘Regressive Tax’ on Low-Income Communities
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- 'Shirley': Who plays Shirley Chisholm and other politicians in popular new Netflix film?
- To combat bullying and extremism, Air Force Academy turns to social media sleuthing
- Eva Mendes says she had 'non-verbal agreement' with Ryan Gosling to be a stay-at-home mom
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Kim Kardashian lawsuit: Judd Foundation claims Skkn by Kim founder promoted 'knockoff' tables
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- French lawmakers are weighing a bill banning all types of hair discrimination
- Hunter Biden asks judge to dismiss tax charges, saying they're politically motivated
- With hot meals and donations, Baltimore residents 'stand ready to help' after bridge collapse
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Ship that smashed into Baltimore bridge has 56 hazmat containers, Coast Guard says no leak found
- Watch as Florida deputies remove snake from car's engine compartment
- A look at where Caitlin Clark, Paige Bueckers and others are headed when season ends
Recommendation
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
Where is Marquette University? What to know about Sweet 16 school's location and more
4 dead, 7 injured after stabbing attack in northern Illinois; suspect in custody
Biden New York City fundraiser with Obama and Clinton on hand is expected to bring in over $25 million
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
Latest class-action lawsuit facing NCAA could lead to over $900 million in new damages
Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers want to make public statements about stolen money. FBI says Murdaugh lied
Republican states file lawsuit challenging Biden’s student loan repayment plan